![]() ![]() ![]() I adds detail, but keeps the grain of the image and has the least amount of artefacts. For all the shots above I found the one called Artemis HQ to be the best. Topaz has several different AI algorithms, each designed to work a little differently. Also everything I shoot is either 12bit 444 at 24fps or 10bit 444 at 50p, so there is an insane amount of color information for the program to work with. I think the reason it works so well is that the F35 HD image is so highly detailed that the Topaz Video Enhance AI algorithm is able to extrapolate more detail out the image. So without further ado here are some screenshots and videos of the original Sony F35 output image and the upscaled version: So much so that I felt it would be beneficial for everyone here to see some comparison shots and screen grabs on a few projects and quick tests I did recently. I recently discovered a program called Topaz Video Enhance AI and I must say the results are pretty amazing. I have been rigging out and shooting with my F35, and recently I have been experimenting with upscaling the footage to 4K. I realize anything newish is better than the 640 cuda cores I have now, but is it worth spending the money on a 30 series? or are the performance gains minimal after say the 1050ti? In other words, is the extra $500 going to significantly reduce processing times or am I going to save a couple seconds?įor what its worth, current processing times for the photo used in the Topaz GPU benchmarking thread on here are 11'50" with the GPU and 1'31" with my CPU in sharpen.It's been a long time since I have posted anything here on the F35 forum. From what people have said here and on other forums/threads, Nvidia is the preferred platform so I will stick with that. In sharpen at least, the CPU is significantly faster (it should be it is significantly newer).ĭespite the astronomical prices for video cards these days, I am looking at purchasing a new one. I am aware of the option to choose GPU over CPU. Sorry for the long delay in my response, I had no idea anyone had responded (I never got notifications). The GTX1650 runs lower power than most (therefore is pretty quiet) and draws this power from the PCI slot. My choice of GPU was really dictated by the need to pick one which did not have an external power connector as it would have meant replacing the PSU on my PC. I only use the Topaz plug-ins after I have cropped the images to viewing size (1800x1200), Denoise AI and Sharpen AI never take more than 10 seconds, although times vary depending on options chosen. I then installed PL4 under WIN10 and this cut the processing time of a RAW file using Deep Prime to around 15 seconds. ![]() This was recognised by PL2 and cut the processing time for a raw file under Prime to around 1 minute 15 seconds. ![]() This was not recognised by PL2 so processing defaulted to the CPU and was taking 5-7 minutes to process a 16mb RAW file under Prime.Īt the beginning of the year I managed to get hold of a 4Gb Nvidia GTX1650. I was running Photolab2 under WIN7 with a fairly old GPU (Radeon R7240). I have a CPU which is probably about 8 years old (Athlon X4740). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |